COM398SUST代做、代写Java/Python程序

日期：2024-05-02 02:20

COM398SUST

COM398 Systems Security

60% OF THE TOTAL MARK

Release Date: 04th March 2024

Submission Date: 3rd May 2024 (12:00 (Noon) UK time)

Date returned with feedback: Within twenty working days after the submission deadline.

In submitting your assignment, you are agreeing to the following declaration of ownership:

I declare that this is all my own work and does not contain unreferenced material copied from any

other source. I have read the University’s policy on plagiarism and understand the definition of plagiarism.

If it is shown that material has been plagiarised, or I have otherwise attempted to obtain an unfair

advantage for myself or others, I understand that I may face sanctions in accordance with the policies

and procedures of the University. A mark of zero may be awarded and the reason for that mark will be

recorded on my file.

University policy on plagiarism is available here.

CW2 is an individual coursework which is worth 60% of the total coursework mark for this module.

The successful completion of CW2 will address the following learning outcomes:

• Develop practical prototypes to experiment with and reinforce core systems security

concepts.

• Illustrate a comprehension of the key issues and principles underlying modern security in

computing systems.

• Characterise the threats faced by computing systems, applications and systems; and

examine the role of security risks assessment and management in IT.

This coursework component requires students to research, write and make a presentation on the topic of

traffic analysis during a DoS / DDoS attack using Wireshark. This element would require each student to

prepare PowerPoint slides (10-15) and vodcast of the student presenting the slides. The vodcast should

be a maximum of 15 minutes long (vodcast exceeding the maximum limit will be penalised according to

the following scheme).

COM398SUST

15 minutes + 10% No penalty

15 minutes + >10% - 20% reduction in the total mark by 5%

15 minutes + >20% - 30% reduction in the total mark by 10%

15 minutes + >30% - 40% reduction in the total mark by 15%

15 minutes + >40% - 50% reduction in the total mark by 20%

15 minutes +>50% The maximum total mark achievable is 40%

This assessment component is designed to encourage students to reflect critically on the fundamentals of

systems security; and relate these fundamental concepts to developments within the field, and to realworld practical examples.

The students should submit the PPT they presented along with the video to show his / her ability to carry

out research on the CW topic.

This coursework component requires you to prepare (see also notes 1 & 2, and the coursework

preparation, submission and provision of feedback sections below) a video-recorded PPT

presentation and the PPT file (video + PPT slides) on traffic analysis using Wireshark. In this

coursework, you will be only considering the TCP/IP protocols for the analysis. Students will have

to log their experience (including any Wireshark based visualisation), observations and analysis

of the captured network traffic in a PPT document describing the TCP/IP protocol suit, and

addressing some specific points related to the provided Wireshark traffic file (PCAP file). The PPT

document and presentation may include (but not limited to) and address the following points:

1. An explanation of the TCP/IP protocols suit including:

a) The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the

difference between the two protocols

b) The Internet Protocol (IP)

c) The Difference between TCP and IP

d) The work of the TCP 3-Way Handshake Process.

2. Describe and contrast the Denial-of-Service (DoS) and Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)

attacks, and their sub-types.

3. In the provided PCAP file, identify the type of the attack; any of your observations and analysis

of the traffic should be justified and explained by adding suitable Wireshark snapshots (or

any suitable Wireshark trace visualisation approach that you can embed in your presentation

/ video)

4. What is the IP address of the suspected attacker in the PCAP file? Justify and explain?

COM398SUST

5. Reflecting on the detected attack(s), you should add in your conclusion the possible context

/ cause(s) that allowed such attack(s) to take place; and countermeasure recommendations.

You should prepare your PPT document and presentation in such a way that it may be understood

by and useful to a fictitious group of students taking a course in computing and who may be

joining placement employers.

Although you have the freedom to adopt and follow your own presentation plan and structure,

the expectation, however, is that there should be an ‘Introduction’ in which you should cover the

TCP/IP protocols suit from which you can elaborate on the DoS and DDoS as in the points above.

The body of the report should be divided and partitioned into sections and any appropriate

visualization means should be used (e.g snapshots).

Your presentation should be evidence-based and supported by relevant and up-to-date

references and links. Sources should include textbooks, academic web sites, manufacturers’ web

sites, RFCs, white papers and academic literature (conferences and journals). You may use your

own selected referencing style.

Note 1: You can use data from such sources as evidence but you need to express this in your own

words. Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will be dealt with according to University policy:

https://www.ulster.ac.uk/student/exams/cheating-and-plagiarism. It is inappropriate to make a

presentation based on sources which are not listed.

Note 2: You should demonstrate good knowledge and understanding of the topics and points of

your presentation; and express them with high effectiveness, conciseness and succinctness.

When preparing your presentation, you should make sure to include only the most relevant

references.

Coursework preparation, submission and provision of feedback:

This coursework should be returned as an electronic submission by the due date specified above.

University regulations require that late submissions attract a mark of zero and will be rigorously

applied, without exception. If you have extenuating circumstances, you should complete an EC1

form according to your course rules; forms are found on your course website – your year tutor

and course director can advise.

• What should be returned is file 1) a copy of the PPT document used as the basis of your

presentation (in this case your researched material / script should either be embedded in

the notes section or appended to the end of your PPT document), file 2) the video (in a

suitable format, e.g. mp4, you may also use Panopto etc – for a Panopto submission,

please refer to the material on the module page). These files should be put saved in the

COM398SUST

same folder which is then compressed (zipped); the obtained ZIP file must be uploaded

using the CW2 Submission link in the module webpage on Cloud Campus.

You should also take note of the following:

• Please ensure the filename of the submitted project folder archive is given as YourBNumber_CW (i.e., B0011_CW2-PPT and B0011_CW2-VODCAST).

• As it may be expected that the file to be submitted can be of a substantial size, you are

advised to attempt your submission early to avoid any IT related issues.

• Feedback will be provided within 20 working days after submission by the date shown

above. Feedback can take the form of comments and a mark as shown herewith:

Student’s ID

Mark overall (%)

Criterion Weight

Research material (to include extent of background research,

quality of analysis and citations & references)

25

Trace files, traffic or design files analysis (as appropriate; and to

include quality of analysis and answers and approach

justification)

40

PPT presentation (to include quality of both PPT and text; ad

coherence of the points made)

20

Video recording (to include quality of recording, creativity,

communication, organization and clarity, use of adequate

visualization techniques (e.g. snapshots)

15

Comments:

1) Research Material: The material you present should be evidence-based and supported

by relevant and up-to-date references.

2) PCAP files analysis: The analysis should include but not limited to filters and graphs to

support your argument(s).

3) PPT presentation: When preparing your presentation, you should be sure to include only

the most relevant points on the slides: you can give more details in the notes section if

you wish to, however, the purpose of the slide is to be succinct in your information. The

background image and snapshots (or additional graphics if you want to use them) and

sound/audio effects should be relevant to the points being made on the slide.

COM398SUST

4) Video recording: Your recording should demonstrate good knowledge and

understanding of the topic of your presentation and express them with high

effectiveness.

Submission: An electronic copy of the assignment may be submitted anytime up until the cutoff date but will not be accepted after it. ASSIGNMENT TO BE SUBMITTED VIA THE DROPBOX

MARKED ‘CW 2 Submission’ WITHIN Cloud Campus.

COM398SUST Coursework 2023/2024

Evaluation and Marking Rubric

COM398 System Security

Component Two: The Project (60%) 

Criteria (100%) 80-100%

High 1st

70-79%

1st

60-69%

2.1

50-59%

2.2

40-49%

3rd

0-39%

fail

Research material

(to include extent

of background

research, quality of

analysis and

citations &

references)

25%

Subject knowledge is

evident throughout the

presentation; information

is clear and correct. The

presentation contains

pertinent points related

to the assignment topic;

and is free of errors and

weaknesses. Such points

are excellently addressed

in an appropriate depth

level and thoroughly

analysed. When needed,

specific support is

provided for each

statement from credible

sources.

Subject knowledge is

evident in much of the

presentation; with very

few exceptions, almost all

presented information is

clear; most references

are suitable, and the

statements made are

supported with

appropriate citations. The

researched material to a

considerable extent is

addressed and analysed

thoroughly. When

particular points are

addressed, it is done in a

particularly proficient

level of conciseness.

Subject knowledge is

evident in the

presentation; however,

there are few

exceptions where

details may be missing

or where particular

points are not

addressed in a good

depth and conciseness.

The researched

material is mainly

meeting the

requirements and

guidelines of the

assignments with very

few exceptions, it is

generally clear and easy

to identify the sources

of statements made

and references are

suitable.

The researched material

in the presentation

partially meets the

requirements and

general guidelines of the

assignment; details can

be missing, and when

particular points are

addressed, it is not

always done in an

appropriate level of

conciseness. There are

instances where material

sources may not be

suitable, or the claims

are not supported by

citations.

The researched

material may be

remotely related to the

topic of the

assignment; details are

somewhat sketchy and

do not support the

topic of the

assignment and may

lack conciseness.

Source materials may

not be relevant to the

purpose of the

presentation. Often, it

can be unclear where

information or facts

come from a source.

The researched

material and

information are

confusing, incorrect,

or flawed; the

presentation material

can be partially or

totally unrelated to the

topic of the

assignment; addressed

points are not well

defined, not well

argued and sketchily

covered. The

presented material

does not meet the

requirement of the

assignment; material is

not supported by

citations, or the

references used are

not suitable / credible.

Trace files, traffic

or design files

analysis (as

appropriate)

40%

The analysis addressed

the majority of the issues

related to the problem

area. The analysis

integrated sufficient

components to the bulk of

its goals.

The analysis addressed a

large part of the issues

related to the problem

area. The analysis

integrated a large

number of components

to the bulk of its goals.

The analysis addresses

a good number of the

issues related to the

problem area. The

analysis integrated a

good number of

components to achieve

a good range of goals.

The analysis partly

addresses some of the

issues related to the

problem area. The

analysis integrated

sufficient components to

achieve a moderate

range of goals.

An inadequate analysis

was presented which

did not clearly address

the problem at hand.

The analysis minimally

integrated elements to

achieve its goals.

The analysis is flawed

or incorrect. It is very

sketchy and does not

address the problem

at hand.

COM398SUST Coursework 2023/2024

PPT presentation

(to include quality

of both PPT and

text; ad coherence

of the points

made)

20%

Points made catch the

viewer/listener’s

attention and hook

him/her to the

presentation: they are

well organized and

motivating. Such

statements and points are

introduced in a logical

order and are well interlinked. The presentation

is error free and does not

encompass any grammar

or spelling errors.

The points made in the

presentation are clear

and coherent and evoke

good interest from the

viewer/listener. The text

has very few mistakes or

spelling errors, details are

presented in a logical

order.

The points made in the

presentation are

generally clear but may

be uncoherent

occasionally and the

link between such

points may not be

obvious. The text has

few mistakes or spelling

errors, details are

presented in a logical

order mainly, although

with some

incoherence.

The points made in the

presentation evoke a

limited interest from the

viewer/listener: they are

brief, sketchy and

incoherent. The

structure of the

presentation from its

introduction to its

conclusion did not orient

the student to the topic

being covered; there are

many spelling and other

mistakes in the text.

The points made in the

presentation do not

evoke interest from

the listener / viewer as

there is a very limited

coherence between

the points made. The

presentation is badly

structured; text

includes many errors.

The points made in the

presentation are

unclear; the listener or

viewer may lose

interest and is hard for

him / her to

comprehend the topic;

the presentation in

incoherent and is ill

structured.

Video recording (to

include quality of

recording,

creativity,

communication,

organization and

clarity, use of

adequate

visualization

techniques (e.g.

snapshots)

15%

The recording runs

smoothly; the

introduction of new ideas

transitions are smooth

and almost unnoticeable.

The video recording,

video or podcast is well

structured. The selections

of graphics, sound effects

and works of art have

assisted in the

communication of ideas.

The recording timing is

perfect.

The recording runs

mostly smoothly; only

very few changes of

introductions of new

ideas transitions are

noticeable. Still the

viewer is hooked and the

recording, video or

podcast is well

structured. The

selections of graphics,

sound effects and works

of art have assisted in

the communication of

ideas. The recording

timing is almost perfect.

Multiple types of

transitions may be

used; however, there is

little impact on the

smoothness of the

recording. Such

transitions are used for

a purpose: to help tell

the story of the

presentation. The

pacing and timing of

the video are good; and

the graphics are well

employed to convey

information.

Multiple types of

transitions may be used;

however, there is some

impact on the

smoothness of the

recording. There are few

transitions which do not

help the purpose of the

recording, or the

recording is ill

structured. The timing

and pacing need to be

reviewed as the

recording is either too

long or too short. When

used, graphics and sound

effects are not always

well employed.

Multiple types of

transitions may be

used: there is a clear

impact on the

smoothness of the

recording. There may

be multiple transitions

which do not help the

purpose of the

recording, or the

recording is ill

structured. The

recording is either too

short or too long; the

pacing is ill suited for

the recording length.

There may be no

graphics, sound effects

or work of art to

support the recording

story.

Video is of poor quality

and is unedited. There

are no transitions

added or transitions

are used so frequently

that they detract from

the video. There are no

graphics. The timing

and pacing are not

suitable.

COM398SUST Coursework 2023/2024

References

CHAPPELL, L. & COMBS, G. 2010. Wireshark network analysis: the official Wireshark certified network analyst study guide, Protocol Analysis

Institute, Chappell University.

OREBAUGH, A., RAMIREZ, G. & BEALE, J. 2006. Wireshark & Ethereal network protocol analyzer toolkit, Elsevier.

COM398SUST Coursework 2023/2024

Appendix A

Wireshark is an open-source tool used for capturing and analysing network traffic at a very granular level. Wireshark shows packet details captured

from different network sources, and breaks down the traffic into the individual layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model (e.g. the

data link, network, transport, and application layers). Wireshark uses display filters to highlight and focus the analysis on the interesting

packets(Orebaugh et al., 2006, Chappell and Combs, 2010). For this CW component, the MC provides a single PCAP file that includes a network

activity. Such file content is to be analysed (the students are not allowed to analyse any other PCAP files as part of this assignment to explain a

Dos / DDos attack; however they are free to use any other PCAP files or resources in order to complete their presentation; e.g. students are at

liberty of using any resources to highlight any TCP, IP or any protocol’s activity using Wireshark for instance)