代做Systems Safety Engineering、代写Java/python程序、代做CS/C++语言

日期：2018-10-24 10:02

Systems Safety Engineering

Assignment 3: Literature review

Semester 2, 2018

Goals:

To gain knowledge of leading research findings into approaches that can be used to improve the

safety of safety-critical systems.

To develop skills in literature reviews and preparing written reports.

Deliverables

Prepare a 2000-2500 word review recent research that describes how system safety can be

improved with the adoption of new or enhanced approaches that focus on ONE of the following

areas:

(a) Inherently safe design.

(b) Defence in depth.

(c) Human factors.

(d) Management and governance systems.

(e) Software.

You must choose a different topic and use different sources from the one you selected for Assignment

0. Alternative topic areas can be negotiated with the course coordinator.

The report must include the following sections:

Introduction explaining purpose of report.

Description of research and approaches advocated to improve system safety.

Application – at least one example of where the approaches has been applied.

Critique of the research and approaches.

Recommendations that industry practitioners should consider when choosing whether to

apply the approach.

All sources of information must be clearly referenced. Evidence of both breadth and depth of

reading is expected in the report. At least one published article or book chapter should be cited for

each of the 3-4 techniques on which you focus. Full bibliographic references must be given for each

paper.

Submission

Due Friday 26

th October, 2018 at 4pm. Late assignment will attract a penalty as per ECP details.

All written submission will be submitted through TurnItIn.

NOTE: This is an INDIVIDUAL assignment. No two assignments should be the same and TurnItIn will

be checking for similarities between assignments. You are encouraged to read the UQ Student

Integrity and Misconduct policy (http://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.60.04-student-integrity-andmisconduct)

which makes a comprehensive statement about the University's approach to

plagiarism, including the approved use of plagiarism detection software, the consequences of

plagiarism and the principles associated with preventing plagiarism.

Page 2 of 2

Marking

This assignment is worth 20% of the overall grade for this course. It will be marked out of 25 marks

as per the breakdown is indicated below and then converted to a percentage.

Criterion Mark Standard

Presentation (3

marks):

Readability, layout,

structure, spelling,

grammar.

3 Highly professional report

2 Consistently high standard of presentation

1 Good presentation with some presentation

faults

0 Poorly prepared work with major presentation faults

Description of

techniques (7

marks):

Sufficient description

of the techniques to

be readily

understood.

7 Excellent summary of the relevant techniques; concise & to

the point; showing depth of understanding

5-6 Good descriptions of techniques; showing depth of

understanding

3-4 Good descriptions of techniques

1-2 Generally good description of techniques with significant

deficiencies

0 Seriously inadequate description of techniques

Description of the

situations to which

the technique is best

suited, and/or

situations where it is

not suitable (5

marks):

The appropriate use

of the techniques is

clearly articulated.

5 Excellent summary of the appropriate scope of use of the

techniques described (such as problem domain, life-cycle

phase, expertise required); excellent coverage ofissues;

clear & to the point

4 Good descriptions of appropriate scope; excellent coverage of

issues

3 Good descriptions of appropriate scope

1-2 Generally good description of factors with significant

deficiencies

0 Seriously inadequate discussion of suitability of techniques

Description of

applications of the

techniques (5

marks):

Examples are given

of systems to which

the techniques have

been applied, with

lessons learned.

5 For each technique, brief description of at least one system

to which the technique has been applied; the systems are

described in sufficient detail to illustrate how safety

assurance was improved by the technique; excellent

coverage of issues encountered in applying the techniques;

clear & to the point

4 Good discussion of applications of the techniques; excellent

coverage of issues

3 Good discussion of applications of the techniques

1-2 Generally good discussion of applications of the techniques,

but with significant deficiencies

0 Seriously inadequate discussion of applications of the

techniques

Use of references (5

marks):

Breadth and depth of

reading clearly

demonstrated

through use of

references and

citations

5 Excellent use of citations to support lit review; full

bibliographic details given, in appropriate format; evidence of

breadth and depth of reading clear

4 Good use of references; evidence of breadth and depth of

reading clear

3 Good use of references

1-2 Significant deficiencies in use of references and/or no

evidence of depth of reading

0 Seriously inadequate evidence of use of references