代写07 33984 Management Education and Learning B代做Processing

日期：2024-07-26 05:01

Assignment Remit

Programme Title	Business Management suite of programmes
Module Title	Management Education and Learning B
Module Code	07 33984
Assignment Title	Resit – Coursework 2: Reflective piece
Level	LC
Weighting	20%
Hand Out Date	-
Due Date & Time	8th August 2024	12 (Noon)
Feedback Post Date	TBC
Assignment Format	Essay
Assignment Length	500 words excluding references
Submission Format	Online		Individual

Assignment:

Reflective essay on career development and narrative including the production of a CV/or online professional profile

The objective of this coursework is for you to critically engage with some theory and practice around career development and narratives, to draw implications for your own personal and professional development.

For this assignment, you need to undertake the following tasks:

· If you have not done so already, produce a CV or online professional profile as part of the learning activities for week 11 of the module;

· If you have not done so already, produce some creative visual material [a drawing or a collage] reflecting your career aspiration and values;

· Assess your career aspirations as expressed in your collage or creative visual against Schein’s career anchors theory or the type of career you aspired to against one of the models of careers discussed in week 10;

· Based on this, reflect on any existing or further professional development activities that you have done/may need to undertake to build-up your CV and align with your career anchors or the type of career that you aspire to.

The word count for this assignment is 250 words maximum excluding your reference list. When submitting your coursework, you need to include a copy of the CV or professional profile you produced as part of the learning activities for week 11 as well as a copy of the drawing or other visual material on your career aspiration that you produced as part of seminar 5 in two appendices to your assignment. It is important to note that we won’t assess the quality of your CV or the visual material that you produced per se but only your reflection on doing these. If you don’t submit a copy of your CV produced during week 11 and/or the creative visual you produced for seminar 5, points will be deducted from your grades

Module Learning Outcomes:

· LO 1. Conduct a case study analysis and discuss, identify and assess responsible business practices and ways to enhance them at an individual level within organisations.

· LO 2. Identify appropriate sources of data, start to practice research and analysis using various academic and secondary data sources.

· LO 3. Demonstrate engagement with own personal, academic and professional development activities and planning within the context of Management Education and Learning;

· LO 4. Understand what reflective practice is and apply it to own personal, academic and professional development.

Feedback to Students:

Both Summative and Formative feedback is given to encourage students to reflect on their learning that feed forward into following assessment tasks. The preparation for all assessment tasks will be supported by formative feedback within the tutorials/seminars. Written feedback is provided as appropriate.  Please be aware to use the browser and not the Canvas App as you may not be able to view all comments.

Use of Generative AI:  

Unless explicitly stated otherwise, students should assume that the use of generative AI within an assessment or assignment is not permitted.  Any assessment submitted that is not a student’s own work, including that written by generative AI tools, are in breach of the University’s Code of Practice on Academic Integrity (https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/as/registry/policy/conduct/plagiarism/index.aspx

Wellbeing Extenuating Circumstances:

The process for Extenuating Circumstances is to support students who have experienced unforeseen issues that have impacted their ability to engage with their studies and/or complete assessments. Students should notify Wellbeing of any extenuating circumstances as soon as possible via the online form, following the guidance provided.

https://intranet.birmingham.ac.uk/social-sciences/college-services/wellbeing/index.aspx

Marking criteria & referencing

The assessment for this module is based on the School assessment marking criteria available in Table 1 below. Please study the criteria carefully before you write your assignments, and consult them regularly while you are writing. In particular, writing assignments should concentrate on argument and analysis rather than description, and build on the material discussed in class. Please proof-read your work before submitting it and make sure that you reference properly all the material used in your essay – have a look here on the guidance on how to reference properly any work you use and cite within your essay.

Table 1: Grading Criteria:

	80+	70-79	60-69	50-59	40-49	30-39	Below 30
Understanding	An original argument that shows independence and clarity of thought and is based on an excellent grasp of the subject	Develops a consistent, logical argument based on good understanding of the subject	Demonstrates a sound grasp of the subject. Arguments are sustained and generally convincing	Basic elements of the subject are demonstrated but misses some key points	Weak argumentation. Key ideas are unclear in places. Some misunderstanding of the subject is shown	Many basic areas of misunderstanding of the subject are shown	Virtually no understanding of the subject
Structure	Fluent and readable	Clear and easy to follow. Well signposted throughout. Convincing links are made between sections	Clear and easy to follow. Well signposted throughout.	Somewhat formulaic and repetitive in places. Links between sections unclear.	Fragmented in places and difficult to follow	Very limited ability to structure an argument, generally difficult to follow	Disorganized, fragmented, impossible to follow
Evidence	Excellent synthesis of relevant theories and examples. Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge of the research literature, including classic as well as current debates	Based on solid research evidence, including journal articles as well as textbook sources. Very good use of examples	Goes beyond textbook sources to engage with relevant journal articles on the topic. Good use is made of examples	Some attempt at synthesis and analysis shown but arguments are inconsistent and not fully developed.	Very little research evidence to support arguments. Heavy reliance on lecture content and basic textbook sources	Predominantly descriptive rather than analytical. Contains numerous sweeping generalisations and unsupported assertions	Virtually no research evidence used, very speculative and heavily opinionated
Reflection	The analysis subjects underlying assumptions about the subject to critical scrutiny. Demonstrates a high level of reflexivity, including an ability to analyse personally-held beliefs and values	Very good awareness of different perspectives in shaping the subject. Some awareness of the author’s values and experiences in shaping their views on the subject is also shown	Some critical analysis of the subject is shown and the role of the author’s values and experiences is mentioned but not developed.	Demonstrates some awareness of different approaches and a willingness to go beyond basic managerialist and functionalist approaches	Very little awareness of different approaches	Uncritical and prescriptive in tone. Predominantly managerialist and functionalist in orientation.  No awareness of multiple perspectives on the subject	Little or no evidence of critical reflection
Style	Excellent, technically free from errors. Flawlessly referenced using Harvard method.	Clearly and fluently written. Very well referenced using Harvard method.	Generally well expressed, but with a few errors. Very well referenced using Harvard method.	Adequately expressed, but with some grammatical and spelling errors. Referenced using Harvard method but with omissions and errors	Unclear, difficult to follow in places. Not adequately referenced.	Very unclear, difficult to follow in many places. Poorly referenced.	Difficult to understand most points. Spelling, grammar and language weak. Little or no referencing provided