代做CSci 4061、代写c/c++设计编程

日期：2024-03-27 09:05

CSci 4061: Introduction to Operating Systems

Spring 2024

Project #2: Enhanced Autograder

Instructor: Jon Weissman

Due: 3/20 Midnight

Intermediate Due: 3/15 Midnight

1. Objective

In this project you will extend/enhance your autograder is a number of ways. You will use 1) pipes

(pipe) to communicate information between the autograder and its children (executables), 2) use I/O

redirection (dup2) and random I/O (*seek), 3) use message-passing queues to implement a different

style of execution (msgget, msgsnd, msgrcv, and msgctl), and use alarms to implement true timeouts to detect infinite/blocked cases (alarm, sigaction, setitimer, and sigfillset). You will

also find several string functions handy (sprintf, strchr, strrchr, strlen), as well as

several I/O functions (unlink, getline, fgets, fseek). Read up on all of these system calls.

To simplify matters, we will remove the ‘slow’ event, so only correct, incorrect, crashed, infinite, or

blocked are detected. You will also determine the value of B (batch size) at runtime by setting it to the

CPU count, which you can use /proc/cpuinfo to obtain. Specifically, count the number of times

processor occurs in the file (implement your code for this in the get_batch_size() function in src/

utils.c). This means that the new autograder will not take B as a command-line argument. Instead, it 1

will take in the directory containing the executables to be graded as the 1st argument. The new usage

will look like the following: “./autograder <testdir> <p1> <p2> … <pn>”.

We have provided quite a bit of useful code in utils.h/utils.c that you can use (or ignore). Either way,

there are a few functions that you must fill in within utils.c.

Constraint 1: please try to run your tests on a lightly-loaded machine if possible (type uptime at

the shell to get the CPU load; if it is high, wait or pick another machine).

Constraint 2: you must cleanup any infinite/blocked processes, both within your program

automatically, but also outside your program at the shell in the event of errors. You can use “ps -u

<your_x500>” and “pkill -9 <exe_name>” to kill lingering processes. The pkill function actually

allows pattern matching, so you might find the following command useful: pkill -9 “sol_*”.

Some source code, object code, and test cases will be provided as needed in a downloadable tar file

from Canvas. You may use your own P1 solution as a starting point or our solution.

2. Changingthewayinformationispassed

You will make several changes to your autograder solution. In P2, you will not only modify the

autograder but the template code as well.

Change 1: the current template returned the answer using a return statement. The answer was

limited to 8 bits or 0 .. 255 due to system call restrictions. This could be limiting in a “real” autograder

where the actual answer may far exceed 8 bit values that would be returned. To fix this, you will modify

the template to output its answer to STDOUT. You will also modify the autograder to redirect the

child’s STDOUT to a file named output/<executable_name>.<parameter> (e.g. output/sol.4). To

do this you will use dup2 in the autograder. Be careful to open the file with write access, and call

dup2 in the child only. Once the autograder gets an answer from each child by reading the output file

(or determines an issue with the child), it should remove the output files in the batch using: int

unlink(const char *pathname), e.g. unlink (“output/sol.4”).

You can double check that your get_batch_size() function is working properly by comparing it to “grep processor /proc/cpuinfo | wc -l” 1

2

If you have bugs you may need to remove the output files at the shell.

We strongly recommended that an output file gets generated for each (executable,

parameter) pair in the autograder, EVEN if the event is crashed, infinite, or blocked, for

consistency. But this is up to you. The output contents will be defined for you in the

provided code.

See that Change 1 works before moving to Change 2!

Change 2: the current autograder passed a test parameter within the exec interface. You are to

create three “versions” of the template (and the corresponding) autograder. All three change the input

location only.

(i) pass each input parameter using exec as before (no new changes over Change 1 in this case.)

(ii) have the template read its parameter via STDIN; to do this you will redirect STDIN to a file via dup2

in the autograder similar to Change 1. Be careful to call dup2 in the child only. The file(s) you will

use are first created by the autograder: input/<parameter>.in for each parameter (e.g. input/

4.in, input/7.in, etc.) . The simplest way is to create the files using the autograder command-line

argv[]. You must also open the input file(s) for read access in the child before dup2.

Remove the input files when you are done using unlink. If you have bugs you may need to

remove the input files at the shell (make clean will also clear these files)

(iii) pass the input parameter using a pipe between the autograder and each child.

For all three versions, use the output mechanism of Change 1.

Create all three versions in the same source files (as real C systems programmers would do). Use #ifdef

<version>, #elif <version2, …> #endif in both template.c and autograder.c to select the <version>-

specific code. You may need to do this in several places. Please use EXEC, REDIR, and PIPE, as the version

names. (e.g. #ifdef EXEC …. #endif, #elif REDIR … , #elif PIPE … #endif).

To compile a specific version of the template and/or the autograder: you can run “make <exec|redir|pipe>”. These

targets use the -D flag to specify the version (EXEC, REDIR, or PIPE).

3. AbetterwayfortimedetectionusingAlarms

Change 3: Now detect a child process running too long by a timeout. To do this, modify autograder.c

(only) to create an alarm handler via sigaction and start the timer using setitimer (set it to expire

after TIMEOUT_SECS seconds).Remove the older code that detected running too long. When the timer

goes off, children that are still running are classified as either infinite/blocked and so you should kill

them using int kill(pid_t pid, int sig). Remember to still wait for each process. However,

since each process will eventually end, there is now no need to pass WNOHANG to waitpid. So, remove it.

Instead, you will use the information from WEXITSTATUS(status) and WTERMSIG(status) to

determine the results for each child process. One issue that might arise is that the alarm might interrupt

the call to waitpid. In that case, you should retry the call to waitpid. Hint: use the value of errno

EINTR to determine if waitpid was interrupted. You will create separate versions of the

autograder, mq_autograder.c, and the template, template_mq.c in this part.

4. Recasttheautograderparadigmusingmessagequeues

Change 4: You will implement one more style of passing information, Linux message queues. The

method in which you distribute work will follow the master-worker model. To do this, your autograder

will write a set of “tasks” of the form [tag executable parameter] to a message queue, where tag

corresponds to a specific worker process. First, the autograder will launch all B workers and send a

message to the worker indicating how many messages it will receive so that it can initialize data

structures for storing the information. Then, the autograder should generate and insert all tasks into the

message queue. The workers will read all of the messages intended for them and send an

acknowledgement message to the autograder process. After the autograder process has received

acknowledgements from each worker, it will send a message to each worker to tell them to begin testing

3

executables. At that point, all workers will begin running their (executable, parameter) pairs in batches of

8, sending results to the autograder process after each batch, until all pairs have been tested. The process

of determining the results of each executable should be the same as in src/autograder.c. Remember to

have each child process in the worker create an output file, output/sol.4, output/sol.7, etc., for

each (executable, parameter) pair and redirect output to these files. Don’t forget to remove the

message queue when you are done.

For all versions, the final step is to create a single output file named results.txt. We have

provided a function that does just that: write_results_to_file in src/utils.c.

5. Howdidthestudentdoonthesubmission?

The final “ask” is that you implement a function called double get_score(char

*results_file, char *executable_name) that uses random I/O to return the score for a given

executable_name (student) in results.txt. The score for a given executable is the number of

parameters that result in “correct” divided by the total number of parameters tested. You must use

random I/O (*seek) to make this efficient. See the description of this function in include/utils.h for

more information and constraints.

6. Testing

For testing, observe the targets in the Makefile. There are options to compile autograder.c/template.c

for EXEC, REDIR, and PIPE, which correspond to make exec, make redir, and make pipe. The

method for making the test executables is similar to P1. A common workflow might look like the

following:

$ make exec N=20 # Recall that N sets the number of compiled template.c files

$ ./autograder solutions 1 3 5

$ make clean # This cleans up the input/output/solutions directories

For testing Change 4 (Message Queues), a common workflow might look like the following:

$ make mqueue N=20 # mq_autograder will now use the sol_X files instead of mq_sol_X

$ ./mq_autograder solutions 1 3 5

$ make clean

We will try to release more test cases as the assignment deadline approaches, but for now there is a

single test case in the Makefile, namely the target “test1_exec”. The expected output for this test

case for results.txt and scores.txt is located in the expected/ folder. It uses the EXEC mode, but the

results should be the same whether you are using EXEC, REDIR, or PIPE.

$ make test1_exec N=20

7. IntermediateSubmission

In one week you will submit a version of your code that implements get_batch_size(), Change 1, and Change 2 -

(i) and (ii) only.

8. ImplementationNotes

? Remember to error check all system calls

? Remember to close all open files and pipes

? Remember that all template binaries must be executable (chmod -R +x test/)

9. Deliverables

4

There will be 2 submissions, one intermediate submission due 1 week after the release of the project

and a final submission due 2 weeks after the release.

Intermediate Submission :

Both intermediate and final submissions should contain the following. Please conform with the folder structure

that is provided to you. Your conformance will be graded.

One student from each group should upload a zip file containing the project folders/files detailed

above to Gradescope. When submitting, make sure to add your group members to your submission on

Gradescope. Your README.md file should contain the following information. Please avoid including

hidden files and junk files in your submission. It makes grading harder. Thank you :)

? How to compile the program

? Any assumptions outside this document

? Team id, team member names and x500’s

? Contribution by each member of the team for final submission only

10. Rubric:Subjecttochange

? 10% README including answers to questions posed in the writeup.

? 15% Intermediate submission [Including README].

? 10% Documentation within code, coding, and style: indentations, readability of code, use of

defined constants rather than numbers. The code should be well commented (need not explain

every line). You might want to focus on the “why” part, rather than the “how”, when you add

comments.

? 65% Test cases: correctness, error handling, meeting the specifications.

You must error check ALL system calls in your autograder.

? A test folder of executables, input parameters to test, a “solution” and the templates will be

provided.

? We will use the GCC version installed on the CSELabs machines to compile your code. Make sure

your code compiles and run on CSELabs.

? Please make sure that your program works on the CSELabs machines e.g., KH 4-250 (cselkh4250-xx.cselabs.umn.edu). You will be graded on one of these machines.

Project Structure Contents

include/ .h header files (utils.h)

lib/ .o library files (utils.o)

src/ .c source files (autograder.c, template.c, mq_autograder.c,

mq_template.c, utils.c)

input/ Contains the <param>.in files during runtime

output/ Contains the <exe>.<param> files during runtime

solutions/ Contains the student executables (sol_X or mq_sol_X)

expected Contains results.txt and scores.txt for specific test cases

Makefile Contains build information used for compiling/testing code

README.md Contains info outlined below

5

11. Miscellaneous

? We will provide an initial package of code, but you will be doing most of the coding.

? To run your program, type autograder <testdir> <p1>< p2> …

? Do not use the system call “system”.

? Said before: KILL all of your stray processes during debugging as needed.

? Any provided binaries are meant for the CSELAB Linux environment. No other binaries will be

distributed.

? ChatGPT or other significant “other” code reuse prohibited. The purpose of this course is to learn by doing,

and not meeting some deadline. If you are unsure about any located online code, contact us.

? On the other hand, locating code snippets that show how system calls can be used is fine.

12. SuggestedWorkplan(preliminaryinblue).

? Read the writeup: in parallel look at the code we have given you.

? Implement get_batch_size() to get B at runtime

? Change 1

o output file redirection

? Change 2

o Ensure that version <EXEC> runs as before

o Get (ii) working

? write all inputs to input files

o Get (iii) working

? Change 3

o Convert time checking to alarm timers for long-running processes

o Think about what should go in the signal handler and how you are going to

ensure infinite/stuck processes are killed.

? Change 4

o Implement mq_autograder.c and mq_template.c using the knowledge you’ve

picked up from implementing autograder.c

o Think of the message queue as another input method (EXEC, REDIR, PIPE,

MQUEUE). However you don’t need to use any # macros for it.

? Implement get_score() program