代写ITPG8.250、代做Data Analytics、代写CS/python, C/C++设计

日期：2018-11-16 10:42

ASSIGNMENT TWO

Semester 2, 2018

ITPG8.250 Data Analytics and Visualisation

Weighting: 50% of final grade

Length: Refer to the assessment detail

Due Date: 6

th December 2018 through Tunitin

Time: 5:00pm

INSTRUCTIONS:

In your first assessment you were requested to investigate various data sources. This data existed in various

forms from CSV to actual data with a database. As part of this data acquisition you were expected to analyse

this data in terms of its variety, volume, velocity and validity, etc. This analysis would have lead you to one or

more data products and potential visualisations. The potential data product would have resulted in identifying

a business reporting gap or need.

In this assessment you will be using your existing data sources* to develop a data product to fulfil one or more

of these gaps.

*Alternative data source: In the event you determined the data from the first assessment was inconclusive,

too small a sample or unsuitable as a data product you are free to identify an alternative source of data that

WILL lead to a potential data products and suitable visualisations. As part of you documentation submission

you will be required to comment on this alternative source of data and give a rationale for the decision to go

with the alternative data source.

DELIVERABLES:

There will be three deliverables for this assessment as described below:

1. Visualisation Product

The purpose of this deliverable will be to take the data you have previously acquired, examined and

analysed and to use it to prepare some form of visualisation.

Your visualisation can be something as straight forward as an infographic or interactive and

engaging using PowerBI/R.

The visualisation MUST only use the data from your first assessment or the alternative data

source as indicated above.

Ideas and examples of the data products you could create are shown here: 15 Cool Information

Graphics and Data Viz from 2016 - http://blog.visme.co/best-information-graphics-2016/

15 Stunning Data Visualizations (And What You Can Learn From Them)

http://blog.visme.co/examples-data-visualizations/

ITPG8.250 Data Analytics and Visualisation Page 2 of 4 ITPG8.250 Case Study 2018

In addition to the actual visualisation that you will submit you will also need to include a manual which

will include;

instructions on how to use it

instructions for the software required to show the visualisation

the data used in the visualisation

2. Poster

To support your visualisation you are to create an electronic poster suitable for printing (printing of

this poster will not be required) on A1 (594 x 841mm). The purpose of this poster is to describe your

data, the context of its use and to showcase your data product and illustrate how it fulfils your

reporting gap/aim.

The poster should be between 1000-2000 words with references and should cover the following sub topics:

Data source (or alternative) and the rationale for the selecting and identifying said data

source.

Comment and rationale on the visualisation choices.

Technical specifications, design and relevant research issues for the visualisation.

How the data was able to lead to a Data product.

Potential future research, application and impacts.

3. Presentation

You will be required to present your final visualisation in the form of a 5 minute presentation.

The presentation should also include

a brief introduction to your case study

the visualisation and the benefits of said visualisation.

This session will include a question and answer session. All students are required to participate in this

session by giving feedback and asking questions of your peers about their presentation.

ITPG8.250 Data Analytics and Visualisation Page 3 of 4 ITPG8.250 Case Study 2018

Marking Rubric Guide

This rubric is my guide for marking, and you should use it as a guide as to my expectations. It contains the main

criteria that I will be considering as I mark your work. You do not have to meet all of these criteria to fall into a

grade range. The amount to which a criterion is present (for example, how many good sources did you use?), and

other considerations will be taken into account – this rubric is provided only a guide to expectations.

Therefore it is not appropriate to use this as a strict classification – e.g. “My report does everything you say in the

‘B’ column therefore I should be a ‘B’” – instead it is more helpful to ask why you received the grade you did.

A

(80-100%)

B

(65 – 79%)

C

(50 – 64%)

D/E

(0 – 49%)

POSTER

Poster is suitable for

publication.

Poster is well structured and

well written.

Poster shows evidence of

synthesis and critical thinking.

Well-formed discussion based

on information presented in

the body of Poster.

Grammar is checked and

proofread and Poster is

readable.

APA referencing is correct in

every case

Poster is suitable as part of

employment.

Poster is suitably structured

and written.

Poster shows evidence of

synthesis and critical

thinking.

Well-formed discussion

based on information

presented in the body of

Poster.

Grammar is checked and

proofread and Poster is

readable.

APA referencing is largely

correct.

Poster quality is acceptable

but could be improved.

Poster is formatted suitably.

Poster contains an

Poster shows evidence of

synthesis and critical analysis.

Information is suitable for the

topic.

Attempts made to compare

and critique sourced

information.

Discussions are based on

information presented in the

body of Poster.

Information is presented

from a variety of acceptable

sources.

Grammar could have been

checked and proofread but

Poster is fairly readable.

APA referencing is used and is

generally correct.

Poster does not show

evidence of synthesis or

critical thinking.

Poster is based mostly on

non-academic or low quality

internet sources or

publications, rather than

high-quality academic and

professional sources.

Poster is based on student’s

opinion rather than

appropriate sources

Poster does not adequately

address the topic.

Poor discussion not

necessarily based on

information presented in

the body of Poster.

Poster is poorly structured

and/or very poorly written.

Grammar is not checked and

proofread and Poster is just

not readable.

ITPG8.250 Data Analytics and Visualisation Page 4 of 4 ITPG8.250 Case Study 2018

APA Referencing is missing

or with significant errors.

.

PRESENTATION

Presentation is suitable and

aimed at the research.

Presentation accurately

communicates main points of

the research, is well

presented and student is well

prepared.

Presentation is generally

suitable for the research.

Presentation includes

introduction, describes the

research clearly and has a

conclusion.

Presentation contains

suitable information about

the research and applied a

suitable methodology to it.

Presentation is unclear or

incomplete.

The research is poorly

described

Presentation is very short or

too long for the research.

VISUALISATION

Visualisation was effective

and of a professional

standard.

Data worked well with the

visualisation.

It told a story about the data.

Visualisation was effective.

Data worked well with the

visualisation.

Used a simple visualisation.

Data was used for the

visualisation.

No visualisation was used

Data was not suitable for a

visualisation